Abstract
Political economy remains a pressing agenda for political geography and human geography more generally. This is evident from recent exchanges between (variously defined) Marxists and post-structuralists on the nature of society and space, via themes such as scale, space, region, public policy, being political, etc. The paper explores imaginative spaces for discussing differences and considers the potential of cultural political economy (CPE)—being advocated by amongst others Bob Jessop and Ngai-Ling Sum—to deliver on this. I highlight some of CPEs strengths and weaknesses, identify missing links, and then make recommendations on how to develop the geographical dimensions of cultural political economy, and, finally, urge serious engagement with the sited complexities and contradictions of re-presentations and material practices. This is done via a study of the ‘skills society’ in the UK.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
