Abstract

BackgroundSacroiliac joint tumor is rare, and the reconstruction after tumor resection is difficult. We aimed to analyze and compare the clinical effects of three-dimensional (3D) printed prostheses and bone cement combined with screws for bone defect reconstruction after sacroiliac joint tumor resection.MethodsTwelve patients with sacroiliac joint tumors who underwent tumor resection and received 3D-printed prostheses to reconstruct bone defects in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were included in the study group Twelve matched patients who underwent sacroiliac joint tumor resection and reconstruction with bone cement and screws in the same time period were selected as the control group.ResultsIn the 3D-printing group, six cases were extensively excised, and six cases were marginally excised. All patients were followed up for 6–90 months, and the median follow-up time was 21 months. Among them, nine patients had disease-free survival, two survived with tumor recurrence, and one died due to tumor metastasis. The MSTS-93 score of the surviving patients was 24.1 ± 2.8. The operation time was 120.30 ± 14.50 min, and the intraoperative bleeding was 625.50 ± 30.00 ml. In the control group, seven cases were extensively excised, and five cases were marginally excised. All patients were followed up for 6–90 months, with a median follow-up time of 20 months. Among them, nine patients had disease-free survival, one survived with tumor recurrence, and two died due to tumor metastasis. The MSTS-93 score of the patients was 18.9 ± 2.6. The operation time was 165.25 ± 15.00 min, and the intraoperative bleeding was 635.45 ± 32.00 ml. There was no significant difference in survival status, intraoperative blood loss, or complications between the two groups (P>0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in operative time and postoperative MSTS-93 scores between the two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionsAfter resection of the sacroiliac joint tumor, reconstruction using 3D printed prostheses was shorter and resulted in better movement function.

Highlights

  • We aimed to analyze and compare the clinical effects of three-dimensional (3D) printed prostheses and bone cement combined with screws for bone defect reconstruction after sacroiliac joint tumor resection

  • Iliosacral resection without reconstruction could serve as an effective treatment option for pelvic type I–IV tumors [1]

  • There are many methods for bone defect reconstruction after sacroiliac joint tumor resection; these can be divided into two categories: biological reconstruction and prosthesis reconstruction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Iliosacral resection without reconstruction could serve as an effective treatment option for pelvic type I–IV tumors [1]. There are many methods for bone defect reconstruction after sacroiliac joint tumor resection; these can be divided into two categories: biological reconstruction and prosthesis reconstruction. Biological reconstruction includes bone fusion, transposition, and inactivated replantation, and the advantages of this approach are that it can achieve permanent bone or scar healing, avoid prosthesis revision and other problems, and obtain satisfactory functional scores [4]. Prostheses include bone cement and metal prostheses, and the application of prosthesis reconstruction can achieve early activity, good cosmetics, initial mechanical stability, and satisfactory function [6]. We aimed to analyze and compare the clinical effects of three-dimensional (3D) printed prostheses and bone cement combined with screws for bone defect reconstruction after sacroiliac joint tumor resection

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call