Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study on the fatigue behavior of a typical third generation Aluminum–Lithium alloy, AA2198-T8, to that of a traditional aerospace aluminum–copper alloy, AA2024-T3 with a focus on developing a methodology for reconstructing the crack growth history. Fatigue testing was conducted using a lap joint configuration designed to induce large amounts of secondary bending for the purpose of accentuating any unique behaviors in these two material systems. Fatigue fracture surface morphology was examined in order to determine the effect of alloying and loading direction relative to plate rolling direction on fatigue crack growth behavior. Crack initiation sites occurred in the vicinity of the fastener hole, at multiple sites along the faying surface, yielding crack tunneling in all specimens, prior to the ductile catastrophic fracture. The fracture surface morphologies in the two alloys were markedly different: the AA2024-T3 exhibited substantial meandering fracture surface, with localized fatigue crack progressing along multiple directions and at different rates. The AA2198-T8 alloy exhibited more uniform but shallower fatigue striations, with numerous micro and macro interlaminar cracks. Crack growth rate (da/dN) measurements along the width, thickness and the striation ridge lines indicated that the latter provides the most reliable results in terms of estimating fatigue crack initiation cycle, crack initiation site, and crack growth rate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.