Abstract
BackgroundThe reconstruction of gene regulatory networks from time series gene expression data is one of the most difficult problems in systems biology. This is due to several reasons, among them the combinatorial explosion of possible network topologies, limited information content of the experimental data with high levels of noise, and the complexity of gene regulation at the transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels. At the same time, quantitative, dynamic models, ideally with probability distributions over model topologies and parameters, are highly desirable.ResultsWe present a novel approach to infer such models from data, based on nonlinear differential equations, which we embed into a stochastic Bayesian framework. We thus address both the stochasticity of experimental data and the need for quantitative dynamic models. Furthermore, the Bayesian framework allows it to easily integrate prior knowledge into the inference process. Using stochastic sampling from the Bayes' posterior distribution, our approach can infer different likely network topologies and model parameters along with their respective probabilities from given data. We evaluate our approach on simulated data and the challenge #3 data from the DREAM 2 initiative. On the simulated data, we study effects of different levels of noise and dataset sizes. Results on real data show that the dynamics and main regulatory interactions are correctly reconstructed.ConclusionsOur approach combines dynamic modeling using differential equations with a stochastic learning framework, thus bridging the gap between biophysical modeling and stochastic inference approaches. Results show that the method can reap the advantages of both worlds, and allows the reconstruction of biophysically accurate dynamic models from noisy data. In addition, the stochastic learning framework used permits the computation of probability distributions over models and model parameters, which holds interesting prospects for experimental design purposes.
Highlights
In classical two class receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis the area under curve (AUC) value gives a measure how well the two classes are separated
An edge is denoted as true positive (TP), if it is a positive or negative link and predicted as a positive or negative link, respectively
False positives (FP) are all predicted postive or negative links which are not correctly predicted, i.e., either they are non-existent or they have another sign in the reference network
Summary
An edge is denoted as true positive (TP), if it is a positive or negative link and predicted as a positive or negative link, respectively. False positives (FP) are all predicted postive or negative links which are not correctly predicted, i.e., either they are non-existent or they have another sign in the reference network. As true negatives (TN) we denote correctly predicted non-existent edges and as false negatives (FN) falsely predicted non-existent edges are defined, i.e., an edge is predicted to be non-existent but it is a positive or a negative link in the reference network
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.