Abstract
In a study of older Alabamians, Klemmack and Roff (1984) identified fear of aging as both an important correlate of subjective well-being and an intervening process through which physical health influences well-being. The present study examined the possibility that fear of aging, as a reflection of personal worries (frequently designated as "negative affect"), is actually an indicator rather than a determinant of subjective well-being. According to this alternative explanation, fear of aging was essentially used to predict itself. A factor analysis of Klemmack and Roff's original data supported this alternative interpretation. As predicted, fear of aging items loaded as a factor with other indicators of "negative affect" and, thus, should have been designated as part of the dependent variable. Furthermore, and contrary to Klemmack and Roff's treatment of subjective well-being as unidimensional, the factor analysis indicated two additional dimensions of well-being--Happiness and Plans for the Future. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of subjecting items to factor analysis and related techniques when developing and validating constructs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have