Reconnaissance et prise en charge initiale du mélanome par des médecins généralistes : enquête dans un département rural à très faible densité médicale

Abstract

Cutaneous cancers are very common, easily visible on skin. The general practitioner (GP) is in the front line to manage the lesions. He has to recognize malignancy and refer most often to the specialist for excision, or consider that the lesion is benign and in ambiguous cases, offer clinical monitoring. The current low medical density in the Centre Val de Loire area makes access to general practitioners (GP) and dermatologists harder. The aim of this study was to evaluate GPs' everyday practice in cutaneous cancers screening in general, and particularly in melanoma screening, in a rural region of France. We sent a questionnaire on November 24th 2015 to all GPs of the Cher department (204 questionnaires), to assess their knowledge and practice of melanoma. The questionnaire comprised 2 parts: the first part was composed of 23 items with a majority of questions focused on melanoma and the second part consisted of clinical cases including 5 benign cutaneous tumors, 4 melanomas and 1 pigmented basal cell carcinoma. GP's were asked to answer in each case: diagnosis, degree of certainty (from 0 to 10), practical attitude (excision, referral to dermatologist or surgeon or surveillance). Their answers were anonymous. The primary endpoint was whether medical decision regarding each case was appropriate, i.e. removal of malignant lesion or referral for removal, and reassurance or surveillance in benign lesions. The response rate was 35% (72 responses). Thirty-eight GPs (53%) had an appropriate management facing the 5 malignant lesions, 18 GP (25%) had an appropriate management in 4 out of 5 cases. The ABCDE rule was known by 58% of responders, the ugly duckling sign of 19%. GPs did not feel comfortable with melanoma: on a growing scale (from 0=not comfortable at all to 10=very comfortable) the average was 4.2 with a median at 5 (range 0-10). They expressed a strong need for training on this topic: on a scale increasing from 0 to 10, the average was 7.9 for a median to 8 (range 3-10). Knowledge about melanoma risk factors, and the level of ease dealing with screening of melanoma was not significantly associated with a better management. The main difficulties were lack of time and the increasing difficulty of access to dermatologist. Fast and easy access by teledermatology was solicited by 89% of GPs. GPs had often appropriate management of skin cancer. The major obstacles to skin's cancer screening were the lack of time and difficult access to dermatologists. The setting-up of an easier access with teledermatology was requested by 89% of responders, and should improve early detection of melanoma.