Abstract

Let $\mathcal{Q}$ be a vertex subset problem on graphs. In a reconfiguration variant of $\mathcal{Q}$ we are given a graph $G$ and two feasible solutions $S_s, S_t\subseteq V(G)$ of $\mathcal{Q}$ with $|S_s|=|S_t|=k$. The problem is to determine whether there exists a sequence $S_1,\ldots,S_n$ of feasible solutions, where $S_1=S_s$, $S_n=S_t$, $|S_i|\leq k\pm 1$, and each $S_{i+1}$ results from $S_i$, $1\leq i<n$, by the addition or removal of a single vertex.We prove that for every nowhere dense class of graphs and for every integer $r\geq 1$ there exists a polynomial $p_r$ such that the reconfiguration variants of the distance-$r$ independent set problem and the distance-$r$ dominating set problem admit kernels of size $p_r(k)$. If $k$ is equal to the size of a minimum distance-$r$ dominating set, then for any fixed $\epsilon>0$ we even obtain a kernel of almost linear size $\mathcal{O}(k^{1+\epsilon})$. We then prove that if a class $\mathcal{C}$ is somewhere dense and closed under taking subgraphs, then for some value of $r\geq 1$ the reconfiguration variants of the above problems on $\mathcal{C}$ are $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hard (and in particular we cannot expect the existence of kernelization algorithms). Hence our results show that the limit of tractability for the reconfiguration variants of the distance-$r$ independent set problem and distance-$r$ dominating set problem on subgraph closed graph classes lies exactly on the boundary between nowhere denseness and somewhere denseness.

Highlights

  • In the reconfiguration framework we are not asked to find a feasible solution to an optimization problem Q, but rather to transform a source feasible solution Ss into a more desirable feasible target solution St such that each intermediate solution is feasible

  • We prove that if a class C is somewhere dense and closed under taking subgraphs, for some value of r 1 the reconfiguration variants for these problems on C are W[1]-hard

  • Our results show that the limit of tractability for Distance-r Independent Set Reconfiguration and Distance-r Dominating Set Reconfiguration on subgraph closed graph classes lies exactly on the boundary between nowhere denseness and somewhere denseness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the reconfiguration framework we are not asked to find a feasible solution to an optimization problem Q, but rather to transform a source feasible solution Ss into a more desirable feasible target solution St such that each intermediate solution is feasible. The authors study mostly graph theoretical vertex subset problems, that is, solutions consist of subsets S ⊆ V (G) of the input graph G For such problems, one natural parameterization is the parameter k, a bound on the size of feasible solutions, another natural parameter is , the length of the reconfiguration sequence. Lokshtanov et al proved that Dominating Set Reconfiguration is W[1]-hard parameterized by k+ on general graphs and fixed-parameter tractable, with parameter k, for graphs excluding Kd,d as a subgraph, for any constant d (in particular on degenerate graph classes and nowhere dense classes). On the reduced instance (G , k , Ss, St) one can run a brute force algorithm to decide whether the initial instance was a positive instance

Our results
Preliminaries
Polynomial kernel
Lower bounds
Lower bounds Theorem 15
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.