Abstract

The aircraft integrated control system reconfiguration laws under failures of actuators, calculated disregarding physical constraints on control surfaces saturation, can lead to a complete loss of aircraft controllability and stability. Despite the large number of scientific publications in this field, practical systematic results have been obtained only for SISO (single input – single output) systems. Problems of the convergence of iterative algorithms restricting the set of admissible solutions and the conservatism of the reconfiguration laws designed using weight matrices do not allow solving this problem in general. For complex MIMO (multi input – multi output) systems there is still no widely accepted universal approach. In this work, control surfaces constraints are regarded in terms of the power of reconfiguration control. It is shown that by slight modification of pseudoinverse (optimal) solution it is possible to obtain approximate pseudoinverse (suboptimal) solutions with priory known minimum power (compensation matrix norm) and error (residual matrix norm) of the reconfiguration for a given degree of approximation. This allows for a multistep consistent reduction in power and increasing in error of reconfiguration, until an acceptable solution is obtained. By providing the greater reconfiguration error at each step we have additional freedom in reducing the reconfiguration power. This leads to a decrease in the amplitude of the deviations of the control surfaces, to which the signals from the failed control channels are redistributed. The simulation example of the aircraft integrated control system reconfiguration under the stabilizer’s actuator failure is presented. It is shown that the pseudoinverse reconfiguration problem solution leads to the significant ailerons’ constraints violation and the loss of aircraft controllability. Regarding control constraints solution reduces several times the deviation of the control surfaces and provides an effective problem solution in the permissible power and error reconfiguration range.

Highlights

  • Problems of the convergence of iterative algorithms restricting the set of admissible solutions and the conservatism of the reconfiguration laws designed using weight matrices do not allow solving this problem in general

  • Control surfaces constraints are regarded in terms of the power of reconfiguration control

  • It is shown that by slight modification of pseudoinverse solution it is possible to obtain approximate pseudoinverse solutions with priory known minimum power and error of the reconfiguration for a given degree of approximation. This allows for a multistep consistent reduction in power and increasing in error of reconfiguration, until an acceptable solution is obtained

Read more

Summary

Научный Вестник МГТУ ГА Сivil Aviation High Technologies

Законы реконфигурации комплексной системы управления при отказах приводов, рассчитанные без учета физических ограничений на амплитуды отклонения рулевых поверхностей, могут привести к полной потере управляемости и устойчивости воздушного судна. В работе ограничения на отклонения рулевых поверхностей предлагается учитывать по мощности затрачиваемого на реконфигурацию управления. На модельном примере реконфигурации комплексной системы управления самолета при отказе привода стабилизатора показывается, что псевдообратное решение задачи реконфигурации приводит к значительному выходу элеронов за ограничения и потере управляемости. Рассчитанное с учетом ограничений на управление, снижает в несколько раз отклонения рулевых поверхностей и обеспечивает эффективное решение задачи в допустимой области мощности и ошибки реконфигурации. Реконфигурация комплексной системы управления (КСУ) воздушного судна (ВС) при отказах приводов осуществляется за счет перераспределения сигналов с отказавших каналов управления на работоспособные [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] по информации от системы диагностирования отказов [8, 9]. Рассчитанные без учета данных ограничений, могут привести к полной потере управляемости и устойчивости ВС

ПОСТАНОВКА ЗАДАЧИ РЕКОНФИГУРАЦИИ КСУ ПРИ ОТКАЗАХ ПРИВОДОВ
Введем обозначения
РЕШЕНИЕ ЗАДАЧИ С УЧЕТОМ ОГРАНИЧЕНИЙ НА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ
ПРИМЕР РЕШЕНИЯ ЗАДАЧИ РЕКОНФИГУРАЦИИ КСУ
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.