Abstract

Meeting European policy targets for reducing nitrogen (N) pollution while maintaining crop production is a large challenge. Strategies to tackle this dual challenge should assess where reducing N losses is most needed while accounting for variation in agricultural systems and ecosystems' vulnerability to N loading. We used a spatially explicit N balance model (INTEGRATOR) to assess whether crop production targets and thresholds for N impacts on biodiversity and water quality in the EU can be reconciled by (i) redistributing N inputs from excess regions to regions where environmental thresholds are not exceeded and (ii) improving N management to reduce ammonia (NH3) emissions from manure and enhance field-level N use efficiency (NUE). At current NUE, reducing N inputs to comply with three environmental thresholds (critical N deposition on terrestrial ecosystems and critical N concentrations in surface water and groundwater) would reduce European crop production by 50%. The widespread exceedance of thresholds does not provide much room for redistribution: increasing inputs to close yield gaps on land where N thresholds are not exceeded can only increase crop production by 3%. To achieve surface water quality targets without crop production losses, average NUE needs to increase from 0.64 to 0.78, whereas achieving groundwater targets only requires a modest increase from 0.64 to 0.67. In hotspot areas, however, crop production and N thresholds can only be reconciled at NUEs of >0.90, which is not feasible. Reducing manure NH3 emission fractions to 0.10 by adopting best-management practices reconciles current crop production and thresholds for agricultural NH3 emission (in view of critical deposition) on only half of the agricultural area. In some regions, technologically feasible improvements in N management are thus insufficient to both maintain current crop production and respect environmental boundaries. Overall, the evaluated measures could reconcile ~80% of current EU crop production with N thresholds.

Highlights

  • Europe is one of the most food secure regions worldwide (FAOSTAT), yet the intensive agricultural systems that support European food production harm ecosystems and biodiversity (EEA, 2020)

  • Maintaining or increasing Europe's crop producing while meeting targets to improve water quality and halt biodiversity loss requires a mix of strategies

  • We found that increasing N inputs to close yield gaps could increase European crop production by about 30%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Europe is one of the most food secure regions worldwide (FAOSTAT), yet the intensive agricultural systems that support European food production harm ecosystems and biodiversity (EEA, 2020). A quarter of Europe's land area is dedicated to arable crops (compared to a global average of 11%, FAOSTAT), and livestock densities are among the highest in the world (Gilbert et al, 2018). Both crop and grassland production are supported by high inputs of nitrogen (N), an essential nutrient for plant production. Much of the excess N is lost to the environment, which adversely affects soil, air and water quality This has resulted in widespread impacts on ecosystems (Dise et al, 2011; Stevens et al, 2020) and human health (Pozzer et al, 2017; Sutton et al, 2011), causing substantial societal costs (Van Grinsven et al, 2013). Reducing N losses is pivotal for meeting several European targets related to water quality and biodiversity (EEA, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.