Abstract

Interactions between carbonyl groups are prevalent in protein structures. Earlier investigations identified dominant electrostatic dipolar interactions, while others implicated lone pair n→π* orbital delocalisation. Here these observations are reconciled. A combined experimental and computational approach confirmed the dominance of electrostatic interactions in a new series of synthetic molecular balances, while also highlighting the distance‐dependent observation of inductive polarisation manifested by n→π* orbital delocalisation. Computational fiSAPT energy decomposition and natural bonding orbital analyses correlated with experimental data to reveal the contexts in which short‐range inductive polarisation augment electrostatic dipolar interactions. Thus, we provide a framework for reconciling the context dependency of the dominance of electrostatic interactions and the occurrence of n→π* orbital delocalisation in C=O⋅⋅⋅C=O interactions.

Highlights

  • Carbonyl groups are prevalent throughout chemistry and biology

  • The groups of Diederich and Raines previously employed the molecular balances 2[6,13] and 3-Y[2e] (Figure 1 B and C), respectively, to study C=O···C=O interactions, but came to different conclusions with regard to the major energetic contributions.[2d,e,3f,6,13] Diederich determined the carbonyl interaction in 2 to be driven by electrostatics, while Raines found n!p* orbital delocalisation between carbonyl groups to play an important role in the 3-Y series of balances

  • To investigate the apparent incongruity regarding the nature of carbonyl interactions we devised a new series of molecular balances, 1-X, to supplement the existing datasets (Figure 1 A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The occurrence of C=O···C=O contacts (between the formamide oxygen and each X-substituted carbon, Figure 2) in the closed conformer of each balance was confirmed computationally (B3LYP/6-31G* and wB97X-D/ 6-31G*, Section S4.1), and by X-ray crystallography for 1-H and 1-Me These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service www.

Results and Discussion
Evaluation of Electrostatic Solvent Effects
Conclusion
Conflict of interest

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.