Abstract
This study sought to understand how individuals experienced participating in a Housing First (HF) program, which is designed to operate along principles of permanent housing, consumer choice, and harm reduction, while simultaneously participating in an alternative to incarceration (ATI) program that incorporates treatment mandates, abstinence monitoring, and court reporting which tend to be in tension with the HF model. Analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 participants suggests that though participants recognized the constraints of the ATI program and legal mandates, they somewhat surprisingly experienced the HF program in accordance with the model's stated principles. The majority of participants remained in the HF program after four years and reported positive outcomes, which many attributed to having a home of their own. Having the ATI program serve as a mediator with the criminal justice system may have allowed the HF program to have a buffer between the participant and the legal system and helped keep the housing and consumer-driven services separate from explicit legal requirements.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
