Abstract

The predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus) is a complex problem: Cats are popular companion animals in modern society but are also acknowledged predators of birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and small mammals. A comprehensive understanding of this conservation issue demands an understanding of both the ecological consequence of owning a domestic cat and the attitudes of cat owners. Here, we determine whether cat owners are aware of the predatory behavior of their cats, using data collected from 86 cats in two UK villages. We examine whether the amount of prey their cat returns influences the attitudes of 45 cat owners toward the broader issue of domestic cat predation. We also contribute to the wider understanding of physiological, spatial, and behavioral drivers of prey returns among cats. We find an association between actual prey returns and owner predictions at the coarse scale of predatory/nonpredatory behavior, but no correlation between the observed and predicted prey-return rates among predatory cats. Cat owners generally disagreed with the statement that cats are harmful to wildlife, and disfavored all mitigation options apart from neutering. These attitudes were uncorrelated with the predatory behavior of their cats. Cat owners failed to perceive the magnitude of their cats’ impacts on wildlife and were not influenced by ecological information. Management options for the mitigation of cat predation appear unlikely to work if they focus on “predation awareness” campaigns or restrictions of cat freedom.

Highlights

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Domestic cat predation is a divisive issue driven by the different motivations of cat owners and conservation biologists

  • We have illustrated how owners fail to perceive the ecological footprint of their cat, and have shown that their opinions on the general problem are not influenced by the predatory behavior of their cat

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The threat posed by domestic cat (Felis catus) predation to native biodiversity is gaining increasing recognition (Woods et al 2003; Baker et al 2008; Loss et al 2013; Loyd et al 2013), together with the realization that developing mitigation measures requires cooperation from cat owners (Lilith et al 2006; van Heezik 2010; Thomas et al 2012). In contrast to natural predators, domestic cats are not reliant on prey availability to meet their daily energy demands and can attain densities far higher than the natural carrying capacity of their environment because their owners provide them with food (Beckerman et al 2007). This, combined with their impulsive predatory instinct, poses a sizeable threat to prey populations (May 1988; Woods et al 2003; Baker et al 2008; van Heezik et al 2010; Loss et al 2013).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call