Abstract
Several methods for the design of compensation for power system stabilizers (PSSs) are used in practice. The object of this paper is to reconcile the methods and explore their relative advantages and disadvantages. Three methods are investigated: the GEP and the P-Vr frequency response approaches, and the method of residues. It is shown the phase response of a modified GEP transfer function (TF) agrees closely with that of the P-Vr TF, thus providing the basis for the design of a robust PSS. Residues yield only a limited number of phase angles that can be used with confidence for design purposes and are consistent with the P-Vr phase response. The remaining residues for rotor modes are affected by variability of participation factor angles and interactions from other machines. Unlike other methods, the P-Vr approach yields magnitude and phase information that simplifies the synthesis of the PSS TF and yields a robust stabilizer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have