Abstract

The 10-min statistics of the turbulence observed on masts often vary with wind speed. On the other hand, the wind engineering computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis often carried out under adiabatic conditions assumes Reynolds number independence. Provided the prescribed upwind condition of CFD corresponds to the ensemble of strong wind, conditional sampling and averaging the observation may be a feasible process to correlate CFD results with the observation. Using comprehensive observation data obtained from complex terrains and operating a suite of large-eddy simulations with O (10 m) horizontal grid resolution, we demonstrate how observation with ensemble averages and conditional samplings can be reconciled with CFD. We find that selecting a high wind speed (approximately 10 m/s at 60 m above ground level) and taking the average of ten sets of 10-min data (corresponding to a sample of 6000 points at 1 Hz) yields better consistency with CFD results. We demonstrate that conditional sampling is more effective than increasing the ensemble size. This tendency is further confirmed when the ensemble size is evaluated by how many times eddies pass through the observation mast.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.