Abstract
Sport is an important area of civil society in both South Africa and England, and this article is broadly concerned with the relationship between sport and personal injury. More specifically, the article compares how rugby is regulated by the tort of negligence in England and delict in South Africa respectively. Regarding liability, for sport there are very specific factors that need to be taken into account. The article is concerned with, firstly, the broader context of sport as an important social and cultural activity, and secondly the specific sporting context that includes the rules of the game as well as the playing culture, with a focus on rugby at junior level. Through a critical and comparative analysis of how the standards of care in sport have been developed in both jurisdictions, the aim of this article is to consider how sport specific elements can be incorporated into the traditional legal principles. This comparative analysis contextualises the various discussions in the light of the differences between the English tort of negligence and the South African law of delict. Our argument is that the context and specificity of rugby should be more explicitly taken into account when evaluating potential liability. To establish a standard of care for sport is complex, with many factors to be taken into account and balanced against one another. The law of negligence/delict therefore needs to be adaptable and flexible to resolve new situations where injuries have occurred. Even in established situations where liability has been previously determined, novel events do occur and knowledge develops that requires a reconsideration of the principles that govern liability. In junior rugby, the risk of very serious injuries is relatively small and the law needs to tread a cautious path through liability, ensuring it is a vehicle that promotes sport rather than creating barriers to its enjoyment and practice. A greater understanding of sport, informed by detailed research, can unearth new areas of potential liability that will need to be considered in the future.
Highlights
This article is broadly concerned with the relationship between sport and personal injury and, compares how rugby is regulated by the tort of negligence in England and delict in South Africa respectively
Sport is an important area of civil society in both South Africa and England and, aside from the health benefits, can be used to develop and deliver a wide range of policies
An important element of such a comparative analysis is to contextualise the various discussions in the light of the differences between the tort of negligence, as applied in England, and the South African law of delict
Summary
This article is broadly concerned with the relationship between sport and personal injury and, compares how rugby is regulated by the tort of negligence in England and delict in South Africa respectively. An important element of such a comparative analysis is to contextualise the various discussions in the light of the differences between the tort of negligence, as applied in England, and the South African law of delict. In so doing it suggests that the context and specificity of rugby should be more explicitly taken into account when evaluating potential liability. The key issue to establish liability will, ordinarily not be whether a duty existed but whether the respective duty of care was breached, a fact which necessitates an analysis of the standard of care owed.[26]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.