Abstract
ABSTRACT Wildlife sanctuaries in Aotearoa/New Zealand involve community groups that often prefer using non-lethal monitoring methods for invertebrates. We examined one method for monitoring tree wētā with the aim of improving monitoring design. Pest management at our study site did not vary for 10 years before our study and remained unchanged between sampling, so we assumed that abundance of tree wētā would not vary significantly over the four years of the study. We recorded occupancy and marked every tree wētā (Hemideina spp.) using the same set of 38 artificial tree-hole refuges (galleries) every 1–2 weeks. We tested the prediction that non-lethal monitoring of tree wētā is a suitable proxy for relative wētā abundance by comparing the number of tree wētā using the same galleries four years apart. As expected, no change in numbers of wētā was detected. However, the level of site/gallery fidelity, seasonal fluctuations and movement between artificial galleries suggest that monitoring design needs to incorporate the life history and behaviour of these insects. We recommend comparison of wētā occupancy be restricted to the same season, galleries be placed more than 50 m apart and checked only once or twice a year.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.