Abstract
Study designRetrospective cohort study of 1430 patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion from 2002 - 2009. Objective: The goal of this study was to compare and evaluate the number of complications requiring reoperation in elderly versus younger patients.Summary of background datarhBMP-2 has been utilized off label for instrumented lumbar posterolateral fusions for many years. Many series have demonstrated predictable healing rates and reoperations. Varying complication rates in elderly patients have been reported.Materials and methodsAll patients undergoing instrumented lumbar posterolateral fusion of ≤ 3 levels consenting to utilization of rhBMP-2 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, number of levels, associated interbody fusion, and types of bone void filler were analyzed. The age of patients were divided into less than 65 and greater than or equal to 65 years. Complications related to the performed procedure were recorded.ResultsAfter exclusions, 482 consecutive patients were evaluated with 42.1% males and 57.9% females. Average age was 62 years with 250 (51.9%) < 65 and 232 (48.1%) ≥ 65 years. Patients ≥ 65 years of age stayed longer (5.0 days) in the hospital than younger patients (4.5 days) (p=0.005).Complications requiring reoperation were: acute seroma formation requiring decompression 15/482, 3.1%, bone overgrowth 4/482, 0.8%, infection requiring debridement 11/482, 2.3%, and revision fusion for symptomatic nonunion 18/482, 3.7%. No significant differences in complications were diagnosed between the two age groups. Statistical differences were noted between the age groups for medical comorbidities and surgical procedures. Patients older than 65 years underwent longer fusions (2.1 versus 1.7 levels, p=0.001).DiscussionDespite being older and having more comorbidities, elderly patients have similar complication and reoperation rates compared to younger healthier patients undergoing instrumented lumbar decompression fusions with rhBMP-2.
Highlights
In the United States, improvements in health have resulted in increased life expectancy and contributed to the growth of the older population over the past century
Despite being older and having more comorbidities, elderly patients have similar complication and reoperation rates compared to younger healthier patients undergoing instrumented lumbar decompression fusions with Recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2)
Elderly patients frequently have lumbar stenosis treated with extensive decompressive laminectomy and subsequent arthrodesis [3]
Summary
In the United States, improvements in health have resulted in increased life expectancy and contributed to the growth of the older population over the past century. In 1980, 11.31% of the U.S population were 65 years or older [1]. The number of elderly patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine qualifying and requiring surgery is expected to increase. Obtaining and utilizing autologous iliac crest bone for spinal arthrodesis is currently considered the “gold standard” [4]. Medical comorbidities, and declining bone quality of the vertebra and iliac crest are important issues to consider when selecting the graft treatment for lumbar spinal fusion in older patients [5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
