Abstract

Abstract This article critically responds to Axel Honneth’s Recognition: A Chapter in the History of Ideas. It argues that, although Recognition provides a compelling historical investigation into the history of the concept of recognition as it emerged in modern France, Great Britain, and Germany, Honneth’s text retains some questionable methodological commitments that undermine its more provocative and potentially wide-ranging contributions. This article interrogates these commitments in addition to some of Honneth’s more specific arguments to speculate about other lessons that Honneth’s history of recognition can provide.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.