Abstract
Article 32 EIR deals with the recognition and enforceability of other judgments than the judgment opening insolvency proceedings which is recognised under Art. 19 EIR. The main focus of the commentary in this part is on the relationship between the EIR and the Brussels I Regulation, especially in the context of ‘judgments deriving directly from the insolvency proceedings and which are closely linked with them’ (Article 32 para 1 subparagraph 2; see also Article 6 EIR). Such judgments, which derive from insolvency-related litigation, fall within the scope of the EIR and are being recognised and enforced under Article 32, even if they were not handed down by the court having opened the insolvency proceedings. The commentary undertakes a detailed and critical analysis of the CJEU’s case law on the difficult and highly practical question which actions have a sufficiently close link to insolvency proceedings and therefore fall within the scope of the EIR and not of the Brussels I Regulation. It also reviews the procedural framework for the recognition and enforcement of judgments under Article 32.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.