Abstract
This case raised important questions about Congress' ability to reshape federal water policy and to decide who should receive federally subsidized water from government reclamation projects in the western states. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a provision of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 that required water districts choosing not to comply with a 960‐acre limitation on land receiving federally subsidized water to pay the government's full cost of delivering the water.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
