Abstract

Despite all the right reasons for phosphorus (P) recovery, many water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs), especially for small WRRFs, cannot afford to implement P recovery technologies. This work systematically evaluated cost impacts of recovering P into fertilizer form from 80 major WRRFs in the Chicagoland area. Using a 20-year present worth analysis, results indicate that it would cost US$21 billion for all 80 major WRRFs to recover P into struvite fertilizer form. Based on unit cost analysis ($ per kg P recovered), P recovery from biosolids is cost-prohibitive due to high energy demand. P recovery from sludge liquor is economically viable but only up to 30% of the influent P load can be recovered. P recovery from sludge ashes is comparable with P recovery from sludge liquor or de-facto P recovery by biosolids land application from a cost perspective but it has the highest P recovery potential (up to 90% of the influent P loads) and lessens the increasing concern of transferring emerging contaminants from biosolids to crops through land application. This leads to a novel approach of a centralized, regional P recovery facility where WRRFs of all sizes can “dispose” of their biosolids for incineration and that P can be recovered as calcium phosphate from the sludge ashes and stored in a monofill as a commodity reserve for future use. This paper proved that the concept of building a commodity P reserve through a centralized P recovery facility is economically justifiable for all WRRFs within the region.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call