Abstract
Existing cytoarchitectonic maps of the human and macaque posterior occipital cortex differ in the number of areas they display, thus hampering identification of homolog structures. We applied quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography to characterize the receptor architecture of the primary visual and early extrastriate cortex in macaque and human brains, using previously published cytoarchitectonic criteria as starting point of our analysis. We identified 8 receptor architectonically distinct areas in the macaque brain (mV1d, mV1v, mV2d, mV2v, mV3d, mV3v, mV3A, mV4v), and their respective counterpart areas in the human brain (hV1d, hV1v, hV2d, hV2v, hV3d, hV3v, hV3A, hV4v). Mean densities of 14 neurotransmitter receptors were quantified in each area, and ensuing receptor fingerprints used for multivariate analyses. The 1st principal component segregated macaque and human early visual areas differ. However, the 2nd principal component showed that within each species, area-specific differences in receptor fingerprints were associated with the hierarchical processing level of each area. Subdivisions of V2 and V3 were found to cluster together in both species and were segregated from subdivisions of V1 and from V4v. Thus, comparative studies like this provide valuable architectonic insights into how differences in underlying microstructure impact evolutionary changes in functional processing of the primate brain and, at the same time, provide strong arguments for use of macaque monkey brain as a suitable animal model for translational studies.
Highlights
The visual modality is possibly the most developed in the primate brain, and occupies the largest amount of cerebral cortex (Van Essen 2003)
Within the primary visual cortex (V1), optic fibers carrying information from the lower and upper visual fields terminate on the dorsal and ventral banks of the calcarine sulcus, respectively (Gillen 2015), and information provided by this segregation is carried on to higher visual areas, which were, categorized as belonging to one of two major visual streams (Ungerleider 1982), i.e., dorsal and ventral streams
Eight subdivisions of the early visual cortex were identified and receptor architectonically characterized in the macaque monkey and the human brain
Summary
The visual modality is possibly the most developed in the primate brain, and occupies the largest amount of cerebral cortex (Van Essen 2003). Comparative studies of the human and macaque visual system showed that the early visual areas V1, V2 and V3 are located more posterior and medially in humans than the correspondingly marked areas in macaques. This is true for V1, which in humans is located almost entirely in the cas, whereby macaque V1 occupies a substantial portion of the operculum on the lateral surface of the occipital lobe (Orban et al 2004; Schira et al 2012). The receptor architecture of areas V1–V3, including their dorsal and ventral subdivisions, as well as of adjoining areas V3A dorsally and V4 ventrally has been comprehensively characterized in the human brain (Eickhoff et al 2008, 2007) and these early visual areas were part of a study on the organizational principles of the human brain as revealed by regional and laminar differences in receptor densities (Zilles and Palomero-Gallagher 2017b), the macaque monkey visual cortex has not yet been subject of such detailed receptor architectonic analyses, since existing studies concentrated mainly on macaque areas V1 and V2, analyzed only a single sample, examined a few receptor types, mostly from a single neurotransmitter system, or did not provide quantitative data (e.g., Hendry et al 1990; Kötter et al 2001; Rakic et al 1988; Rakic and Lidow 1995; Rosier et al 1993, 1991; Zilles and Clarke 1997; Zilles and Palomero-Gallagher 2017a)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.