Abstract

CLIL instruction has been reported to be beneficial for foreign language vocabulary learning since CLIL students show higher vocabulary profiles than students of their same age in traditional EFL contexts. However, to our knowledge, the receptive vocabulary knowledge of CLIL and non-CLIL learners at the end of primary and secondary education has not been examined yet. Hence, this study aims at comparing the receptive vocabulary size 79 CLIL primary learners with the receptive vocabulary knowledge of 331 non-CLIL learners at the end of primary and secondary school. Sex-based differences were also analysed. The 2k Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) was used for the purposes of the study. Results revealed that learners’ receptive vocabulary sizes lie within the most frequent 1000 words, non-CLIL secondary school students throw better results than primary students but the differences between the secondary group and the CLIL group are not statistically significant. As for sex-based differences, we found no significant differences among the groups. These findings led us to believe that the CLIL approach offers a benefit for vocabulary acquisition since CLIL learners have been exposed to the foreign language for a shorter period of time and the results are quite similar to their non-CLIL secondary school partners.

Highlights

  • Vocabulary is a crucial aspect in second language acquisition (SLA), overall proficiency, and general academic achievement (e.g. Daller, van Hout and TreffersDaller 2003; Morris and Cobb 2004)

  • These figures clearly indicate that the overall receptive vocabulary size of this sample of Spanish English as a foreign language (EFL) learners is considerably lower than 2,000 words, regardless of their educational level

  • The receptive vocabulary size of our Spanish primary and secondary school EFL learners lies within the range of first 1,000 most frequent words in English, according to the results of the 2k Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vocabulary is a crucial aspect in second language acquisition (SLA), overall proficiency, and general academic achievement (e.g. Daller, van Hout and TreffersDaller 2003; Morris and Cobb 2004). In this sense, examining learners’ word knowledge can provide with interesting and reliable insights into their overall language knowledge. This can be a good way of exploring the effects of CLIL instruction in the learning of English as a foreign language (EFL) by Spanish primary and secondary school students at the end of each compulsory educational level (i.e. primary and secondary school). We are interested in examining the impact of CLIL tuition on learners’ receptive lexical competence versus that of general instruction in the FL.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call