Abstract
No abstract available.
Highlights
Creating a variety of material, commenting on the Bible as primary text was an effective mechanism that allowed the imperial conquerors to communicate with their ‘subjects’; it was a way of developing new mechanisms of subjecting them and converting them into docile cooperative subjects
The articles published in this issue of HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies were subjected to a rigorous blind peer review process in accordance with the required academic standard set for this journal
Netshapapame and Mavhandu-Mudzusi engage with the notion of biblical discourse within the context of HIV and AIDS
Summary
Creating a variety of material, commenting on the Bible as primary text was an effective mechanism that allowed the imperial conquerors to communicate with their ‘subjects’; it was a way of developing new mechanisms of subjecting them and converting them into docile cooperative subjects. Authors in this special collection engage on the topic of the reception of biblical discourse in Africa from various perspectives. The papers in this special collection apply various theoretical lenses in their analysis of biblical discourse in South Africa. In his paper, engages with the notion of poverty, COVID-19 and vaccine nationalism.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
