Abstract
The article deals with the issue of the nature and quality of reviews of scientific publications in the research area of architecture and urban planning. The aim of the article is to indicate the unique character of the undertaken research topic, often implying unconventionally undertaken research methods. As a result, the proposals for extending the offer of publishing patterns are discussed, which could enable the presentation of research results in the discipline of architecture and urban planning. These present, in a way that goes beyond the schemas, issues from the border of exact, humanistic, natural, social and artistic sciences. The methods used allow for the characterization of selected scientific publications as well as scientific reviews.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
