Abstract
Previously, immediate reactions to ionic high-osmolar iodinated contrast media (ICM) were regarded as nonimmunological. How ever, despite the use of lower-osmolar ICM, ICM hypersensitivity still occurs in some patients and recent studies suggest that there would be a true allergic response, especially in more severe form. Currently, it is important to identify the sensitized ICM and avoid the agent; however, the usefulness of skin tests and challenge tests has not yet been established, since there are few large-scale studies on them. Although, skin test-negative ICM can be safely used in clinical practice, conflicting results have been reported through various studies, depending on the challenge protocols used. Therefore, standard protocols need to provided. Even if a cul prit agent is not proven by skin tests, its use should be avoided. Reuse of contrast media increases the risk of occurrence of hyper sensitivity reactions. For patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media, premedication can help prevent recur rence, but breakthrough in hypersensitivity is not fully achieved by premedication, especially when the previous reaction was a se vere form such as anaphylaxis. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an optimal strategy to choose alternative ICM and premedica tion protocols to prevent recurrence of hypersensitivity reactions to nonionic contrast media. (Allergy Asthma Respir Dis 2020;8:107-113)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.