Abstract

Although researchers often comment on the popularity of nature-inspired meta-heuristics (NIM), there has been very little empirical data to support the claim that NIM are growing in prominence compared to other optimization techniques. This paper presents strong evidence that the use of NIM is not only growing, but indeed appears to have surpassed mathematical optimization techniques and other meta-heuristics in several metrics related to academic research activity (publication frequency) and commercial activity (patenting frequency). Motivated by these findings, this article discusses some of the possible origins of this growing popularity including historical bias, conceptual appeal, simplicity of implementation, and algorithm utility.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.