Abstract

Current data are needed to manage our soil resources but there are few recent purpose-built surveys of soil fertility, a critical asset for natural resources management. Instead, data collected for other purposes are re-used as has been the case in our area of interest here: managing the threat of soil erosion on farm land in East Gippsland. The dynamic nature of soil fertility challenges this approach, so we conducted a new survey using 234 paddocks selected at random. These new data were compared to re-purposed legacy data. Plant tissue samples from a selected subset were used to assess micronutrients. Separately, 27 paddocks that had been sampled during 1975–89 were re-tested to examine temporal changes. We concluded that many paddocks are now strongly or very strongly acidic and deficient in molybdenum (Mo) and boron (B). More specifically, those under dairying, cropping and horticulture are likely to have adequate phosphorus (P) while those grazed for meat and wool are likely to be deficient in P. We concluded that grazing enterprises need to either re-adopt soil testing and fertiliser treatment or adopt management practices suitable for acid soils deficient in P, Mo and B, if their paddocks are to support sustainable productive agriculture. Data from the re-tested paddocks suggest that, in general, many were once less acidic, highlighting the difficulties in using legacy data. Also, contrasts in soil pH and available P between paddocks under different management regimes, highlighted the difficulties in using re-purposed data. We concluded that a statistically designed survey is a preferable basis for natural resource management.

Highlights

  • Australia’s National Soil Research, Development and Extension Strategy (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 2014) aims to ‘improve the quality, availability and access to soil data and information to meet user needs’, so as to achieve ‘improved understanding of the condition of the resource base’

  • Spatial information on soil fertility has often been created by opportunistic use of soil data from the extension programs or soil testing services offered to farmers (Helyar et al 1990; MacLaren et al 1996; Natural Heritage Trust (Australia) National Land and Water Resources Audit 2001; Scott et al 2007; Apted et al 2014; Marchant et al 2015)

  • Analysis was confined to examining relationships based on expected cause-and-effect rather than casual co-relation, so as to efficiently summarise and communicate differences in soil fertility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Australia’s National Soil Research, Development and Extension Strategy (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 2014) aims to ‘improve the quality, availability and access to soil data and information to meet user needs’, so as to achieve ‘improved understanding of the condition of the resource base’. Spatial information on soil fertility has often been created by opportunistic use of soil data from the extension programs or soil testing services offered to farmers (Helyar et al 1990; MacLaren et al 1996; Natural Heritage Trust (Australia) National Land and Water Resources Audit 2001; Scott et al 2007; Apted et al 2014; Marchant et al 2015). Inferences drawn from such re-purposed data can be challenged. We report on a purpose-built survey of soil fertility in the farming land of East Gippsland, to both show current trends and to explore and learn from the contrasts with re-purposed legacy data

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call