Abstract

The emerging of shuffle model has attracted considerable attention of scientists owing to his unique properties in solving the privacy problems in federated learning, specifically the trade off problem between privacy and utility in central and local model. Where, the central model relies on a trusted server which collects users’ raw data and then perturbs it. While in the local model all users perturb their data locally then they send their perturbed data to server. Both models have pron and con. The server in central model enjoys with high accuracy but the users suffer from insufficient privacy in contrast, the local model which provides sufficient privacy at users’ side but the server suffers from limited accuracy. Shuffle model has advanced property of hide position of input messages by perturbing it with perturbation π. Therefore, the scientists considered on adding shuffle model between users and servers to make the server untrusted where the users communicate with the server through the shuffle and boosting the privacy by adding perturbation π for users’ messages without increasing the noise level. Consequently, the usage of modified technique differential privacy federated learning with shuffle model will explores the gap between privacy and accuracy in both models. So this new model attracted many researchers in recent work. In this review, we initiate the analytic learning of a shuffled model for distributed differentially private mechanisms. We focused on the role of shuffle model for solving the problem between privacy and accuracy by summarizing the recent researches about shuffle model and its practical results. Furthermore, we present two types of shuffle, single shuffle and m shuffles with the statistical analysis for each one in boosting the privacy amplification of users with the same level of accuracy by reasoning the practical results of recent papers.

Highlights

  • The recent studies suggest an intermediate model between users and the analyzer to eliminate the weaknesses points in both Differential privacy (DP) and LOCAL DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACY (LDP) by reducing the gap between privacy and utility

  • The security of users’ data and the model updates are secured by LDP and CENTRAL DEFERENTIAL PRIVACY (CDP) algorithms implementing during the training process

  • CDP is weaker to an adversary, whereas LDP can keep the users updates before transfer them to the analyzer

Read more

Summary

INTRODUTION

Federated learning (FL) [Li et al (2020)] is an improved distributed machine learning which allows multiple devices into a decentralized system to accumulate the raw data to assist in the training process of the model. FL has made improvements in the privacy and security of machine learning models because the server process aggregates only local parameters from each user and the server doesn’t know anything about user raw data. The framework of DP-FL with shuffle model consists of users, shuffle and analyzer [Balle et al (2019), Meehan et al (2021), Erlingsson et al (2019), Bittau et al (2017)] In this framework, users train their model by using their own data set, using local randomization to implement DP. The untrusted analyzer receives m messages from users’ entity via shuffle functionality This model has been proved that it has the ability to overcome the limitations on accuracy of local algorithms, while protecting several of their appropriate attributes. Moushira Abdallah Mohamed Ahmed, Shuhui Wu, Laure Deveriane Dushime, and Yuanhong Tao

BACKGROUNDS
FEDERATED LEARNING
SHUFFLE MODEL
THE APPLICATIONS OF FEDERATED LEARNING
DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACY IN FEDERATED LEARNING
DIFFERENTIALLY PRIVATE FEDERATED LEARNING WITH THE SHUFFLE MODEL
THE PRIVATE MULTI-MESSAGES FL IN A SHUFFLE MODEL
THE PRIVATE MULTI MESSAGES FL VIA M PARALLEL SHUFFLE MODELS
THE ACCURACY IN MULTI MESSAGES SHUFFLE MODEL FOR BINARY SUMMATION
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
Design
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.