Recent progress in the study of lattice-preferred orientation of olivine

Abstract

Recent progress on the study of olivine LPO after (Karato et al., 2008) is reviewed with the emphasis on three issues: (i) LPO formed by the rotation of olivine crystals with anisotropic shape (euhedral crystals) in diffusion creep (Miyazaki et al., 2013), (ii) B-type LPO in the olivine + basaltic melt (Holtzman et al., 2003), and (iii) pressure change in the influence of LPO (Ohuchi and Irifune, 2013). Regarding the role of euhedral crystals, we show that euhedral olivine crystals occur in a mixture of forsterite and diopside (used by (Miyazaki et al., 2013)) but not in a mixture of olivine and enstatite. Consequently, the results by reported by (Miyazaki et al., 2013) are not applicable to the Earth’s upper mantle where olivine co-exists mostly with enstatite. Also we show that the LPO reported by (Miyazaki et al., 2013) is not consistent with the shape of olivine, and the observed LPO is likely due to dislocation glide (A-type fabric) under the conditions near the diffusion-dislocation creep regime boundary.Regarding the LPO of olivine with the presence of melt, (Qi et al., 2018)’s experimental study with the torsion geometry did not reproduce the B-type fabric reported by (Holtzman et al., 2003) indicating that the B-type fabric reported by (Holtzman et al., 2003) was indeed an artifact of the direct shear experiments. The weak LPO found by (Qi et al., 2018) (compared to that by (Zimmerman et al., 1999)) can be explained by the smaller grain size in their experiments. I conclude that a majority of the experimental results on olivine LPO at relatively low pressures (<2 GPa) can be understood based on the basics of deformation mechanism map and LPO caused by various slip systems in olivine. Regarding a claim by (Ohuchi and Irifune, 2013) that the A-type LPO (a-slip) dominates at high water content and c-slip dominates at low water content at pressures higher than ∼7 GPa, a compilation of experimental studies by (Masuti et al., 2019) and the observed LPO of the ultra-deep xenolith do not support their claim. However, experimental studies under these high-pressure conditions are limited and there remain large uncertainties regarding the LPO at high pressures (P>3 GPa).