Abstract

Mycotic keratitis is common in warm, humid regions with a varying profile of pathogenic fungi according to geographical origin, socioeconomic status, and climatic condition. Clinical diagnosis can be challenging in difficult cases and those refractory to treatment. Fungal hyphae on microscopic examination and culture isolation have been the gold standard in the laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis. A culture isolate of the aetiological fungus is essential to perform antifungal susceptibility testing. As the culture isolation of fungi is time-consuming, causing delays in the initiation of treatment, newer investigative modalities such as in vivo confocal microscopy and molecular diagnostic methods have recently gained popularity. Molecular diagnostic techniques now help to obtain a rapid diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Genomic approaches are based on detecting amplicons of ribosomal RNA genes, with internal transcribed spacers being increasingly adopted. Metagenomic deep sequencing allows for rapid and accurate diagnosis without the need to wait for the fungus to grow. This is also helpful in identifying new emerging strains of fungi causing mycotic keratitis. A custom-tear proteomic approach will probably play an important diagnostic role in future in the management of mycotic keratitis. Positive repeat cultures are being suggested as an important gauge indicative of a poor prognosis. Positive repeat fungal cultures help to modify a treatment regimen by increasing its frequency, providing the addition of another topical and oral antifungal agent along with close follow-up for perforation and identifying need for early therapeutic keratoplasty. The role of collagen crosslinking in the treatment of fungal keratitis is not convincingly established. Rapid detection by multiplex PCR and antifungal susceptibility testing of the pathogenic fungi, adopted into a routine management protocol of fungal keratitis, will help to improve treatment outcome. Early therapy is essential in minimizing damage to the corneal tissue, thereby providing a better outcome. The role of conventional therapy with polyenes, systemic and targeted therapy of antifungal agents, newer azoles and echinocandins in fungal keratitis has been widely studied in recent times. Combination therapy can be more efficacious in comparison to monotherapy. Given the diversity of fungal aetiology, the emergence of new corneal pathogenic fungi with varying drug susceptibilities, increasing the drug resistance to antifungal agents in some genera and species, it is perhaps time to adopt recent molecular methods for precise identification and incorporate antifungal susceptibility testing as a routine.

Highlights

  • Corneal blindness is responsible for about 1.5 to 2 million new cases of monocular blindness every year, with ocular trauma and infectious keratitis being accountable for the majority of cases [1,2]

  • Fungal keratitis is common in warm, humid regions with varying geographic profiles

  • In vivo confocal microscopy for fungal hyphae detection is helpful to keratitis can result in poor prognosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Corneal blindness is responsible for about 1.5 to 2 million new cases of monocular blindness every year, with ocular trauma and infectious keratitis being accountable for the majority of cases [1,2]. Fungal keratitis constitutes about 50% of all culture-positive cases of infective keratitis in developing countries [3,4] It is common in areas with warm and humid climates and among populations mainly engaged in agricultural activities. There is the rising concern of resistance to topical antifungal therapeutic agents which has led to the increased adoption of antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) in the management of fungal keratitis in recent times. We discuss recent concepts in the management of mycotic corneal infections with relevance to current perspectives on the role of newer investigative imaging and molecular diagnostic modalities, repeat cultures, antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST), antimycotic therapeutic agents and the outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) and TPK in fungal corneal ulcers

Clinical Diagnosis
Culture
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
Methods
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
Treatment
Topical Agents
Systemic Therapy
Targeted Therapy
Natamycin
Amphotericin B
Voriconazole
Itraconazole
Posaconazole
Ketoconazole
Luliconazole
Echinocandins
Other Therapeutic Agents
Nanoparticles
Contact-Lens-Based Drug Delivery
Photo Activated Chromophore for Keratitis
Photodynamic Therapy
Surgical Management
Findings
10. Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.