Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper reports on research in which pit designs using the Lerchs-Grossman and Moving Cone Algorithms were individually compared with those of the Dynamic Cone Algorithm. The comparisons wore on the basis of total final pit economic values. Details of the study are described and the results obtained discussed. The results showed that each algorithm in the pairs tested, gave several higher final pit economic values than the other. It is concluded that a correct approach to open pit optimization is to use several different algorithms and then select the beat valued pit from among the resulting designs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
