Recent developments in on-demand voiding therapies.

Abstract

One cannot survive without regularly urinating and defecating. People with neurological injury (spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, stroke) or disease (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spina bifida) and many elderly are unable to voluntarily initiate voiding. The great majority of them require bladder catheters to void urine and "manual bowel programs" with digital rectal stimulation and manual extraction to void stool. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections frequently require hospitalization, while manual bowel programs are time-consuming (1-2 hours), stigmatizing, and cause rectal pain and discomfort. Laxatives and enemas produce defecation, but onset and duration are unpredictable, prolonged, and difficult to control, which can produce involuntary defecation and fecal incontinence. Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) consider recovery of bladder and bowel function a higher priority than recovery of walking. Bladder and bowel dysfunction are a top reason for institutionalization of elderly. Surveys indicate that convenience, rapid onset and short duration, reliability and predictability, and efficient voiding are priorities of SCI individuals. Despite the severe, unmet, medical need; there is no literature regarding on-demand, rapid-onset, short-duration, drug-induced, voiding therapies. This article provides in depth discussion of recent discovery and development of two candidates for on-demand voiding therapies. The first, DTI-117, a neurokinin2 receptor agonist, induces both urination and defecation after systemic administration. The second, DTI-301, is a TRPV1 receptor agonist that induces defecation after intrarectal administration. The review also presents clinical studies of a combination drug therapy administered via iontophoresis and preclinical studies of neuromodulation devices that induce urination and defecation. Significance Statement Safe, effective, on-demand, rapid-onset, short-duration, drug-induced, voiding therapy could eliminate or reduce need for bladder catheters, manual bowel programs, and colostomies in patient populations that are unable to voluntarily initiate voiding. People with spinal injury place more importance on restoring bladder and bowel control than restoring their ability to walk. This paradigm-changing therapy would reduce stigmatism and healthcare costs while increasing convenience and quality of life.