Abstract

Carbon constraints, as well as the growing hazard of greenhouse gas emissions, have accelerated research into all possible renewable energy and fuel sources. Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), a novel technology able to convert soluble organic matter into energy such as hydrogen gas, represent the most recent breakthrough. While research into energy recovery from wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells is fascinating and a carbon-neutral technology that is still mostly limited to lab-scale applications, much more work on improving the function of microbial electrolysis cells would be required to expand their use in many of these applications. The present limiting issues for effective scaling up of the manufacturing process include the high manufacturing costs of microbial electrolysis cells, their high internal resistance and methanogenesis, and membrane/cathode biofouling. This paper examines the evolution of microbial electrolysis cell technology in terms of hydrogen yield, operational aspects that impact total hydrogen output in optimization studies, and important information on the efficiency of the processes. Moreover, life-cycle assessment of MEC technology in comparison to other technologies has been discussed. According to the results, MEC is at technology readiness level (TRL) 5, which means that it is ready for industrial development, and, according to the techno-economics, it may be commercialized soon due to its carbon-neutral qualities.

Highlights

  • Water and energy are two inseparable commodities, which greatly influence the growth of human civilization

  • The current analysis focuses on the mechanisms that produce hydrogen, the biology that underpins them, and the use of wastewater to produce hydrogen

  • Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) technology is still in its early stage, since it faces several obstacles such as mass transfer restrictions, energy loss, and other issues that must be thoroughly investigated on a pilot and industrial scale utilizing real-world wastewaters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water and energy are two inseparable commodities, which greatly influence the growth of human civilization. The main purpose of wastewater treatment was to protect downstream users from health risks using various physical (grit and flotation) and chemical (neutralization, flocculation, oxidation, etc.) methods These methods are all expensive and result in sludge production and secondary water pollution [9]. When biomass is employed as a raw material, the organic compounds dissolved in the wastewater have a high energy state, making mechanical combustion difficult The raw ingredients such as various types of wastewaters, lignocellulosic biomass, and organic compounds, utilized in biological hydrogen generation are readily accessible, cost-effective, and waste from other sectors. According to a recent techno-economic study, water electrolysis utilizing solar energy is still not economically viable when compared to hydrogen generation from fossil sources. Microbial electrolysis cell technology provides a dual advantage of gaseous energy production and organic waste treatment in these circumstances [14]

Sources of Wastewater
Industrial Wastewater
Sugar-Based Wastewater
Cellulose- and Chitin-Based Waste
Landfill Leachates
Protein-Based Wastewater
Need for Hydrogen as a Biofuel
Biological Hydrogen Production
Bio-Photolysis
Dark Fermentation
Photo Fermentation
Existing Wastewater Treatment Technologies and Their Bottlenecks
Thermodynamics and Electrochemistry for Hydrogen Production Using MEC
Anodic Potential for Hydrogen Production
Hydrogen Production Rate and Coulombic Efficiency
Energy Recovery
MEC Reactor Architecture
Single-Chambered MEC
Smallest-Scale MEC
A Cathode-on-Top Single-Chamber MEC
Dual-Chambered MEC
Scale-Up Reactor Designing
Cost–performance curves for eight scenarios a financially competitive
Optimizing Features Affecting the MEC System Design for Hydrogen Production
Feedstock
Domestic or Residential Wastewater
Fermentation Effluents
Swine Wastewater
Refinery Wastewater
Winery Wastewater
Inoculation
Anode Material
Cathode Material
Effect of Electrolyte pH
Temperature
Applied Potentials
Bottlenecks in Commercialization of MECs for Biogas Production during
Economic and Cost Analysis
Scale-Up Strategies
Integrated MEC Systems
10. Comparison between MEC Technology and Water Electrolysis
Findings
11. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call