Abstract

The spread of the progressive from dynamic to stative verbs started in the seventeenth century, and slowed down in the late twentieth century. The present study investigates recent change in the use of stative progressives in conversational British English from the early 1990s to the early 2010s. The analysis focuses on a total of 100 stative verb lemmata in the spoken, demographic sections of the original and newBritish National Corpus, restricted to a variable context where a progressive could potentially occur. Results indicate that overall, stative progressives have not become more frequent in the last twenty years, and that the group of stative verbs is highly heterogeneous. However, particular verbs, such asexpectandthink,do indeed combine more frequently with the progressive now, which could be the cause of the popular impression of the continuing spread of stative progressives. In addition to a frequency-based analysis, a distinctive collexeme analysis offers a more fine-grained analysis of the collostructional preferences of individual verb lemmata and semantic classes of stative verbs. This analysis reveals that the stative verbs are heterogenous and that the lemmata most distinctly associated with the progressive belong to the group of stance verbs.

Highlights

  • We currently lack information on very recent developments in the increasing frequency of the progressive (BE + V-ing)

  • We present the results of our analyses: section 5.1 focuses on the frequency of stative progressives in the 1990s and 2010s, while section 5.2 presents the collostructional preferences of stative verbs

  • The frequency of stative progressives has not increased in the period between the early 1990s and early 2010s; the proportion of progressive instances of all stative verbs is 6.43 percent in BNC1994DS, and 6.50 percent in BNC2014S

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We currently lack information on very recent developments in the increasing frequency of the progressive (BE + V-ing). We focus on developments in the use of individual lemmata, as well as groups of stative verbs, based on the analysis of relative frequency within a variable context and with the help of distinctive collexeme analysis (see Gries & Stefanowitsch 2004). This method enables us to assess degrees of association between individual lexical verbs and the two constructions, the progressive and the non-progressive.

The progressive aspect and the stative verb: poles apart?
The spread of stative progressives before the 1990s
BNC1994 and BNC2014
The variable context: progressive versus non-progressive
Statistical approach
Results
Frequency of stative progressives
Types of stative verb: spread to new semantic domains?
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call