Abstract
While the particulars of Mills v. Commissioner of Taxation may be unique to the Australian tax system, it is the interplay between the prudential capital requirements, in accordance with which the capital was raised, and the desire of the ATO to protect the revenue against unfair, in the ATO’s view, outcomes by applying the general anti-avoidance rule that makes this case interesting to readers outside Australia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Finance and Capital Markets (formerly Derivatives & Financial Instruments)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
