Abstract
Hydrate-based CO2 capture (HBCC) has received increasing attention, due to such advantages as the mild operating pressure and temperature, the ease of regeneration and its unique separation mechanism. This review paper is focused on the chemical additives and the mechanical methods that have been investigated to improve the CO2 separation efficiency and energy consumption through HBCC technology. Detailed comparisons of the effects of various chemical additives and mechanical methods on gas consumption, operating conditions, hydrate induction time and CO2 recovery are critically reviewed. The limitations and challenges of HBCC, in comparison with the conventional methods for CO2 capture also are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
