Abstract

This paper provides an overview of recently developed two dimensional (2D) fragment-based QSAR methods as well as other multi-dimensional approaches. In particular, we present recent fragment-based QSAR methods such as fragment-similarity-based QSAR (FS-QSAR), fragment-based QSAR (FB-QSAR), Hologram QSAR (HQSAR), and top priority fragment QSAR in addition to 3D- and nD-QSAR methods such as comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), comparative molecular similarity analysis (CoMSIA), Topomer CoMFA, self-organizing molecular field analysis (SOMFA), comparative molecular moment analysis (COMMA), autocorrelation of molecular surfaces properties (AMSP), weighted holistic invariant molecular (WHIM) descriptor-based QSAR (WHIM), grid-independent descriptors (GRIND)-based QSAR, 4D-QSAR, 5D-QSAR and 6D-QSAR methods.

Highlights

  • Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is based on the general principle of medicinal chemistry that the biological activity of a ligand or compound is related to its molecular structure or properties, and structurally similar molecules may have similar biological activities [1]

  • QSAR models can be used in designing new chemical entities (NCEs) and are regarded as essential tools in pharmaceutical industries to identify promising hits and generate high quality leads in the early stages of drug discovery [5,7]

  • We present recently available fragment-based QSAR methods and multidimensional-QSAR methods developed over the past few decades

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is based on the general principle of medicinal chemistry that the biological activity of a ligand or compound is related to its molecular structure or properties, and structurally similar molecules may have similar biological activities [1] Such molecular structural information is encoded in molecular descriptors and a QSAR model defines mathematical relationships between descriptors and biological activities of known ligands to predict unknown ligands’ activities. After molecular descriptors are defined and generated for all ligands in the dataset, the step is to decide a suitable statistical or mathematical model to find the relationship between such descriptors and biological activities. Traditional 2D-QSAR methods such as Free-Wilson and Hansch-Fujita models use 2D molecular substituents or fragments and their physicochemical properties to perform quantitative predictions. We present recently available fragment-based QSAR methods and multidimensional (nD)-QSAR methods developed over the past few decades

Fragment-Based 2D-QSAR Methods
Top Priority Fragment QSAR
Other Fragment-Related QSAR Studies
Topomer CoMFA
Alignment-Free 3D-QSAR Methods
Comparison of 2D or Fragment-Based QSAR versus 3D or nD-QSAR Methods
54 HIV-1PR inhibitors
Conclusion
50. ALMOND
Findings
57. Biograf
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call