Abstract
Receiver operating characteristic curves have been used to compare a variety of pictures derived from a number of hard copy devices used with EMI computed tomography scanners. The pictures examined were obtained from (a) a Shackman camera with bromide paper, (b) a Polaroid camera and Polaroid film, (c) a Shackman backed camera with radiographic film, and (d) an EMI multiformat imager. The results show no significant difference in detectability of an experimental object close to noise values using the various hard copies. It is concluded that the choice of a hard copy device might be based on considerations other than its physical performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
