Abstract

Time series of soil moisture (SM) data in the Qinghai–Tibet plateau (QTP) covering a period longer than one decade are important for understanding the dynamics of land surface–atmosphere feedbacks in the global climate system. However, most existing SM products have a relatively short time series or show low performance over the challenging terrain of the QTP. In order to improve the spaceborne monitoring in this area, this study presents a random forest (RF) method to rebuild a high-accuracy SM product over the QTP from 19 June 2002 to 31 March 2015 by adopting the advanced microwave scanning radiometer for earth observing system (AMSR-E), and the advanced microwave scanning radiometer 2 (AMSR2), and tracking brightness temperatures with latitude and longitude using the International Geosphere–Biospheres Programme (IGBP) classification data, the digital elevation model (DEM) and the day of the year (DOY) as spatial predictors. Brightness temperature products (from frequencies 10.7 GHz, 18.7 GHz and 36.5 GHz) of AMSR2 were used to train the random forest model on two years of Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) SM data. The simulated SM values were compared with third year SMAP data and in situ stations. The results show that the RF model has high reliability as compared to SMAP, with a high correlation (R = 0.95) and low values of root mean square error (RMSE = 0.03 m3/m3) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE = 19%). Moreover, the random forest soil moisture (RFSM) results agree well with the data from five in situ networks, with mean values of R = 0.75, RMSE = 0.06 m3/m3, and bias = −0.03 m3/m3 over the whole year and R = 0.70, RMSE = 0.07 m3/m3, and bias = −0.05 m3/m3 during the unfrozen seasons. In order to test its performance throughout the whole region of QTP, the three-cornered hat (TCH) method based on removing common signals from observations and then calculating the uncertainties is applied. The results indicate that RFSM has the smallest relative error in 56% of the region, and it performs best relative to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), and European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI) project. The spatial distribution shows that RFSM has a similar spatial trend as GLDAS and ESA CCI, but RFSM exhibits a more distinct spatial distribution and responds to precipitation more effectively than GLDAS and ESA CCI. Moreover, a trend analysis shows that the temporal variation of RFSM agrees well with precipitation and LST (land surface temperature), with a dry trend in most regions of QTP and a wet trend in few north, southeast and southwest regions of QTP. In conclusion, a spatiotemporally continuous SM product with a high accuracy over the QTP was obtained.

Highlights

  • Soil moisture (SM) is a key state variable for understanding hydrological processes with a variety of environmental applications [1,2]

  • We evaluated the quality of the random forest (RF) simulation results by analyzing the agreement between random forest soil moisture (RFSM) and soil moisture active passive (SMAP) SM over the test period (May 2017 to May 2018) in terms of their R, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE) and bias vaRleumeoste

  • The results show that the RF model has high reliability, with high correlation (R = 0.95) and low values of RMSE (RMSE = 0.03 m3/m3) and MAPE (MAPE = 19%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil moisture (SM) is a key state variable for understanding hydrological processes with a variety of environmental applications (e.g., ecological, geomorphological and water resource management) [1,2]. Long-term data products such as from the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI) [5], where different sensor types were merged by a cumulative distribution function (CDF)-matching procedure, temporal inconsistencies are introduced, e.g., due to different responses to the challenging terrain (e.g., from different microwave frequencies, active and passive operation modes etc.) Data assimilation products, such as from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) [6,7], usually present soil moisture data from deeper soil layers, which cannot respond to changes in the surface caused by some small precipitation events [8]. They significantly underestimate soil moisture and have a small variation range

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call