Abstract

As the largest Muslim country, Indonesia is on the way to balancing the order of its people, their religious practice, and how these two are influencing the public sphere. There is an existing regulation called Anti-Blasphemy Law which contains any rule to guarantee that religion and the public sphere do not contradict from one to another. Related to it, this research found that in this digital era with an advanced development on technology, some factors potentially create any form of manipulation on religion which comprises religion itself, social dynamic, and legal instrument. This form of manipulation has also triggered the advancement of the interdependency discourse on religion and the public sphere. In the context of Indonesia, by its characteristic, to separate religion and the public sphere will only create other problems among religious people. Using normative legal research, this paper aims to look at the relevance of the Anti-Blasphemy Law to the socio-structural conditions of Indonesian society. In this research, it is argued that religion and the public sphere (state) should be placed through a form of functional differentiation concept, and found that there is an interdependent relationship between religion and the public sphere, nevertheless, Anti-Blasphemy Law failed to create and maintain this relation. Hence, legal reform on the Anti-Blasphemy Law has become a necessity in ensuring a balanced and harmonious (state) religious life.

Highlights

  • The historical journey has placed religion as a conceptual system that cannot be separated from the development of human civilization

  • It is argued that religion and the public sphere should be placed through a form of functional differentiation concept, and found that there is an interdependent relationship between religion and the public sphere, AntiBlasphemy Law failed to create and maintain this relation

  • As this research is focused to examine the existence of Presidential Decree No 1/PNPS/1965 concerning the Prevention of Abuse and/or Blasphemy of Religion, 5 we found that the implementation of the law has even made “unintended consequences” to the society itself.[6]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The historical journey has placed religion as a conceptual system that cannot be separated from the development of human civilization. Rebalancing Religious Policy and the Concept of Public Sphere: Indonesia Cases Petrus Richard Sianturi, Josua Navirio Pardede and Septian Dwi Riadi the function and development of religion. 2 in the realm of intellectual notion alone and in the space of human observation, namely society, issues related to religion will continue to generate new discourses and arguments, in this case , the Indonesian people. It uses secondary data including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources that are processed with quantitative data Those sources and resources are analyzed descriptively to explain the actual and contextual reality between the three main components namely law, religion, and society in Indonesia. 14 Yayan Sopyan, “Menyoal Kebebasan Beragama dan Penodaan Agama di Indonesia”, Jurnal Cita Hukum 3, No 2 (2015) 195-196. Pengaturan Perundang-undangan dan Konsep Hukum Islam”, At-Tafahum: Journal of Islamic Law 1, No.[1] (2017): 57-58

Religion and Society in Indonesia
Social Reality and Religion Today
Anti-Blasphemy Law
Functional Differentiation
Balancing Indonesian Religious People and State Policy
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call