Abstract

The molecular basis of constitutive gene activation is largely unknown. The yeast profilin gene (PFY1), encoding a housekeeping component of the actin cytoskeleton, is constitutively transcribed at a moderate level. The PFY1 promoter dispenses with classical transactivators and a consensus TATA box; however, it contains a canonic site for the abundant multifunctional nuclear factor rDNA enhancer-binding protein (Reb1p) combined with a dA.dT element. Reb1p binds specifically in vitro. Mutation of this site reduces PFY1 expression to about 35%. A nucleosome-free gap of about 190 bp is centered at the genomic Reb1p binding site in vivo and spans the presumptive core promoter and transcriptional initiation sites. Nucleosomes at the border of the gap are positioned. Mutation of the Reb1p motif in the genomic PFY1 promoter abolishes nucleosome positioning, fills the gap with a non-positioned nucleosome, and reduces transcription by a factor of 3. From permutation studies we conclude that Reb1p induces a strong bend into the DNA. Phasing analyses indicate that it is directed toward the major groove. The data suggest that Reb1p plays an architectural role on DNA and that Reb1p-dependent DNA bending leads to a DNA conformation that is incompatible with packaging into nucleosomes and concomitantly facilitates constitutive transcription. In the absence of other transcription activators, Reb1p excludes nucleosomes and moderately stimulates transcription by distorting DNA.

Highlights

  • The actin cytoskeleton is fascinating because of both the complexity of its functions and the dynamics of its structure

  • We show that constitutive transcription at the PFY1 promoter dispenses with classical transactivators

  • Reb1p Influences Transcription and Nucleosome Arrangement at the PFY1 Promoter—Yeast general regulatory factors constitute an interesting class of DNA-binding proteins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The actin cytoskeleton is fascinating because of both the complexity of its functions and the dynamics of its structure. It is supposed that constitutive transcription reflects a static situation in which the promoter is in a permanently activated state These promoters are presumed to be constitutively kept free of nucleosomes [18, 19], but the principles and mechanisms underlying nucleosome exclusion are far from clear. Reb1p is among the abundant so-called “general regulatory factors.” It is multifunctional, as it is involved in transcriptional termination [20, 21], binds to telomeres and centromeres [22], and plays a role in transcriptional regulation of a plethora of functionally unrelated genes transcribed by either polymerase I or II [18, 22,23,24,25,26]. If nucleosome exclusion is a general feature, it is yet unknown which property of Reb1p prevents assembly of nucleosomes in the flanks of its binding site extending over distances as long as about 100 bp to either side

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call