Abstract
84 Background: In 2006, the FIQCC (comprised of 11 practice sites) initiated a comprehensive review of quality of care specific to breast cancer based on QOPI/NCCN/ACOS and panel consensus quality indicators. Feedback on indicator performance was provided to participating practices in 2007 to encourage quality improvement efforts. Re-assessment of adherence to the same performance indicators was conducted in 2009. Methods: Chart reviews were conducted for breast cancer patients (pts) seen by a medical oncologist at FIQCC sites in 2006(n=602) and 2009(n=636) Quality indicators included: 1) presence/completeness of pathology report; 2) documentation of surgery type; 3) documentation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and if SLNB positive documentation of a complete axillary node dissection; and 4) mammogram usage post surgery. Statistical comparisons of 2006 and 2009 data were performed using the Pearson chi-square exact test based on Monte Carlo estimation. Results: The median age of pts (99% female) was 60 years (range 24-94). Compared to 2006 data, improvements were made in specimen orientation (69%-2006, 78%-2009; p=0.001) and inking of margins (89%-2006, 96%-2009; p=<0.001). In clinical node negative N0 pts, SLNB was performed in 87%, up from 82%-2006 (p=0.035). Of the pts with a metastatic SLNB, 86% went on to have a complete axillary node dissection, but not statistically significant compared to 79% in 2006 (p=0.10). Compliance continues to be highly variable across practice sites with obtaining a mammogram within 14 months of surgery (79%) (p=0.002); but the range narrowed: 26%-98% (2006) and 56%-92% (2009). Significant variances also continued in 2009 across practice sites for margin orientation (p<0.001), inking of the margins (p=0.04), and performance of SLNB (p<0.001). Conclusions: The FIQCC identified quality improvement needs in multiple aspects of breast cancer care. Improvements in margin orientation/inking, use of SLNB and follow-up mammograms after definitive surgery made over the course of this initiative speak to the benefits of continual re-assessment of adherence to performance indicators to guide quality improvement.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
