Abstract

Recent years have seen a proliferation of platform-based “shared mobility services” (SMS) such as car-, bike-, and e-scooter-sharing in many cities in Germany and around the world. At the same time, these services have become the subject of intense debates: Are they replacing private car travel, thus contributing to sustainable mobility in cities? Or are they drawing users away from public transit and cycling while obstructing public space? From the perspective of sustainable mobility politics, it seems far from clear which role these new services could play in transitioning to a less car-centric mobility system. While a number of potential effects and ensuing governance issues of shared mobility services (e.g., regarding questions of equitable access, data governance, the role of public versus private actors) have already been studied, this article explores the role of shared mobility services (SMS) in triggering system dynamics and feedback loops in the context of sustainability transitions. The article connects questions regarding the sustainability effects of “shared mobility services” with the role of “push” measures to reduce private car traffic in cities. Using a theoretical framework from socio-technical transitions research and from the sociology of technology, it describes the recent growth of shared mobility services in Berlin as an example of the upscaling dynamics of socio-technical niche innovations. Drawing on a series of workshops with mobility service providers and representatives of public authorities, it analyses the potential for conflict as well as for coalition-building between service providers and public authorities. Based on the theoretical concept of the role of feedback loops and windows of opportunity for transitions, it shows how the market growth of shared mobility services has added momentum to an already ongoing political debate over the legitimate use of public space in Berlin. Against this backdrop, the article discusses how growing numbers of car-, bike-, and e-scooter-sharing vehicles could open up windows of opportunity for re-distributing space away from private cars. The article concludes that supporting and regulating SMS will be key to steering their growth in the direction of sustainability.

Highlights

  • Since the release of the latest IPCC report [1] and the first indications of climate change becoming visible in central Europe, the urgency to steer the transport sector in the direction of ecological sustainability has been recognized more and more broadly

  • Using the example of Copenhagen, Henderson and Gulsrud [21] argue that a transition to a more sustainable transport system cannot be conceived as a mere “win–win”-process, when it comes to access to public space [38]: To substantially increase the share of alternative modes of transport, be it cycling, walking, public transport, or potentially shared mobility services” (SMS), space has to be taken away from private car traffic

  • I explored the role of SMS such as car, bike, and e-scooter-sharing in a transition to a less car-centered mobility system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the release of the latest IPCC report [1] and the first indications of climate change becoming visible in central Europe, the urgency to steer the transport sector in the direction of ecological sustainability has been recognized more and more broadly. While many studies focus either on usage patterns or on the immediate effects of SMS on the transport system, this article connects the debate on SMS with the debate around “push” measures to reduce private car traffic [20] and with the “politics of mobility” surrounding the issue of public space in cities This perspective stresses that the role of different elements of sustainability transitions, such as rising levels of cycling, rising support for car-restraining policy measures, and growing demand for new mobility services, cannot be understood in isolation but need to be assessed as parts of complex system dynamics.

Multi-Level-Model of Socio-Technical Transitions
Complexity
Mobility Politics in Transition
Transformation Dynamics
Assessing the Role of SMS in Sustainable Mobility Transitions
Background
Cracks in the Regime
Limited Action Spaces for Regulation
Exploring Potential for Conflict or Coalition Building
Access to Public Space
Coverage
Access to Data
Communication
Upscaling and Breakthrough in the Context of Established Regime Structures
Conflict or Coalition Building?
Complexity Unfolding
Conclusions
BMU 2020: Klimaschutz in Zahlen
12. Polis 2019
Findings
67. SenUVK Berlin 2020
72. City of Düsseldorf 2019

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.