Abstract
AbstractThe proliferation of international investment agreements reflects the tireless efforts of many governments in the world to attract foreign investment and significantly improve their investment environment, including Vietnam. However, investment overshielding without regard to public policy objectives also has negative consequences, such as indirectly and directly causing environmental pollution at investment sites. Vedan Vietnam and Formosa Ha Tinh Steel are prime examples of ecological incidents with long‐term damage to the host State. Using critical and case study approaches, this article examines the reasons behind those incidents and analyses Vietnam's improper response to the cases. More importantly, the article criticises the lack of alignment of the domestic legal system and international investment law. Finally, the article suggests the interconnected relationship between domestic and international law and recommends treaty‐making directions to avoid the risk of Vietnam and other ASEAN countries becoming a ‘new haven’ of environmental pollution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
