Abstract

This paper addresses the dearth of methodological analysis in business history. Questioning the sources of women’s marginality in Israeli business history, I integrate a feminist standpoint epistemology with a historically nuanced actor–network theory (ANTi-History) into a critically reflexive methodological account. I claim that this valuable analytical tool elaborates on business historians’ craft and offers three main contributions. First, it bolsters the disciplinary rigor of business history and its potential advantages for management and organizational scholarship. Second, the material semiotics of this approach highlights the extent to which nonhuman objects affect power relations in the course of producing a singular historical representation. Third, by tracing the performance of analytical categories such as gender in the course of knowledge production, it delineates the operation of mechanisms of marginality in the past and within the archive. These insights contribute to a better understanding of how business history was rendered masculine.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call