Abstract

Writing is a particularly complex and demanding task that needs to be mastered to assure students’ success at school. In the last decades, the scientific community has been unanimous about the involvement of cognitive and motivational processes in the learning of writing. However, little is still known about some motivation-related processes, such as the reasons why students write. Therefore, this study analyzed the role of motivation in writing in developing writers, by examining the motives to write of 321 sixth graders. We used the Writing Motivation Questionnaire, which is a new instrument tapping the following motivations for writing: curiosity, involvement, grades, competition, social recognition, emotional regulation, and relief from boredom. Findings confirmed the multidimensional nature of motivations to write and supported the validity and reliability of the instrument. Also, results revealed that the strongest motives to write were grades and curiosity, and that curiosity and social recognition were significant predictors of writing quality, above and beyond attitudes and self-efficacy. Together these findings confirm the key role of motivation in writing and provide validity evidence of the Writing Motivation Questionnaire. This seems a useful tool to better understand the motivational processes involved in learning to write. However, despite the increasing research investment in this area, it is still important to carry out further studies that may contribute to the enrichment of the field of writing motivation.

Highlights

  • The role of motivation in writing has been acknowledged over the last 30 years

  • We found that attitudes as well as self-efficacy for ideation and for self-regulation were correlated with all motivations for writing; self-efficacy for conventions showed low correlations, albeit low, with grades and curiosity; and all motives to write were moderately associated with each other, with correlations ranging from 0.24 and 0.79

  • Results showed a very good fit of the data to the model, χ2(120, N = 321) = 222.208, p < 0.001, confirmatory fit index (CFI) = 0.951, root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052, P(rmsea ≤ 0.05) = 0.385, RMSEA 90% CI [0.041;0.061]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The role of motivation in writing has been acknowledged over the last 30 years. In the 80s, McLeod (1987) discussed the motivational dimension of writing, defining it as “an emotional as well as a cognitive activity” considering that “we feel as well as think when we write” (p. 426). Ten years later, Hayes (1996) put forward a writing model, placing motivation/affect processes (e.g., goals, predispositions, beliefs, attitudes) side by side with cognitive processes. Graham (2018a,b) highlighted the importance of motivation in writing by proposing the Writer(s)-WithinCommunity. According to this model, control mechanisms (viz., attention, working memory, and executive control) along with mental and physical operations for producing text (viz., conceptualization, ideation, translation, transcription, and reconceptualization) draw on a set of long-term memory resources. Control mechanisms (viz., attention, working memory, and executive control) along with mental and physical operations for producing text (viz., conceptualization, ideation, translation, transcription, and reconceptualization) draw on a set of long-term memory resources Among these resources, one can find several beliefs that influence

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call