Abstract

Long-term adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is particularly important for fecal testing. Some U.S. studies report that only 25% of individuals repeat fecal testing annually. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify barriers and facilitators reported by patients with suboptimal screening adherence to refine interventions for starting ongoing adherence to CRC screening. We also explored whether participants, particularly never screeners, would be willing to do a CRC screening blood test. Forty-one patients who previously enrolled in the Systems of Support to Increase CRC Screening (SOS) trial were interviewed 4–5 years later. Participants were purposively selected to include men and women with diverse race/ethnicities who had either been inconsistent screeners or had never screened during the first three years of SOS despite receiving at least two rounds of mailed fecal tests. Two interviewers conducted 30-min telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. An iterative thematic analysis approach was used. Themes related to screening barriers were more pervasive among never screeners including: (1) Avoidance (inattention, procrastination) (2) Concerns about handling stool; (3) Health concerns; (4) Fear of a cancer diagnosis or positive test results. Themes related to screening facilitators were more often mentioned by participants who screened at least once including: (1) Use of a simpler 1-sample fecal test; (2) Convenience of mailings and doing the test at home; (3) Salience of prevention, especially as one got older; and (4) Influence of recommendations from providers, family and friends. Participants had diverse preferences for the number (3 on average) and types (phone, mail, text) of screening reminders. Some participants did not prefer e-mail links to the patient shared electronic health record because of difficulties remembering their password. It was acceptable for a nurse or medical assistant not from their clinic to call them as long as that person was knowledgeable about their records and could communicate with their physician. Participants, especially never screeners, were generally very enthusiastic about the potential option of a CRC screening blood test. Future CRC screening programs should be designed to minimize these barriers and maximize facilitators to improve long-term screening adherence. Primary Funding Agency: The National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01CA121125). Registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT00697047 .

Highlights

  • Thanks for agreeing to schedule this interview with me

  • The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with colonoscopy every 10 years, fecal testing annually, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 10 years combined with annual fecal testing, virtual colonoscopy every 5 years, or a combination of DNA and fecal testing every 1 to 3 years [4]

  • A few trials have evaluated repeated interventions and factors related to ongoing adherence, which is important for individuals choosing fecal testing, with completion recommended annually [5, 6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thanks for agreeing to schedule this interview with me. Is this still a good time to talk? You may recall participating in the Smart Options for Screening (SOS) study in the past. 1) Could you tell me about your experience, the last time you considered whether or not to do a screening test for colon cancer?. Probes: Are you familiar with a stool test (kit, FIT kit) that screens (or test) for colon cancer? Long-term adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is important for fecal testing. Some U.S studies report that only 25% of individuals repeat fecal testing annually The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify barriers and facilitators reported by patients with suboptimal screening adherence to refine interventions for starting ongoing adherence to CRC screening. A few trials have evaluated repeated interventions and factors related to ongoing adherence, which is important for individuals choosing fecal testing, with completion recommended annually [5, 6]. In the Netherlands, among 23,339 participants, adherence to 3 rounds of biennial FIT ranged from 60% to 63%, with 72% participating at least once and 48% participating in all rounds [8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call