Abstract
Debt specialization (DS) has become widespread among organizations in recent years. However, the reasons for its existence and prevalence have yet to be fully examined, especially among small and large firms. This paper aims to empirically determine whether both small and large companies pursue DS strategies for similar reasons. We use seven years’ panel data for 2009–15 for 419 nonfinancial companies in Pakistan, listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. The results of the comparative analysis confirm the existence of DS across organizations. Small firms follow DS to reduce expected bankruptcy costs, economize information asymmetries and decrease agency conflicts due to limited ingress to the debt market. Large companies include fewer types of debt to reduce operational risk and flotation costs and for building a good reputation. We suggest several theoretical justifications for these results, based on tradeoff and agency cost theory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
