Abstract
Three experiments investigated matching bias in conditional reasoning tasks. Matching bias occurs when Ss ignore negations and match named items. Experiment 1 used an abstract and a thematic version of Evans's (1972) construction task. Results showed that matching may be due to an interaction between task demands and constructing contrast classes when interpreting negations. Experiment 2, which used Wason's (1968) selection task, introduced a manipulation to ease contrast-class construction. Confirmation plus falsification dominated over matching. Experiment 3 introduced two other manipulations to aid contrast-class construction with abstract material. Confirmation was facilitated, matching was suppressed, and falsification remained unchanged. These results suggest that matching occurs only when insufficient or ambiguous information prevents the intended interpretation of negations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
